U.S. v. JONES-ROSS, 8:14CR409. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150120b91
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [51]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by January 28, 2015. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [51] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before January 28, 2015. 2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such mot
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [51]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by January 28, 2015. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [51] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before January 28, 2015. 2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such moti..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [51]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by January 28, 2015.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS [51] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before January 28, 2015.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between January 16, 2015, and January 28, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
