Lasko v. Roberts, 2:15-CV-00967-KJD-GWF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160302e82
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#3) of Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. entered October 5, 2015, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (#1) be granted and that Plaintiff's Complaint (#1, Ex.1 ) be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation on October 15, 2015. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#3) of Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. entered October 5, 2015, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (#1) be granted and that Plaintiff's Complaint (#1, Ex.1 ) be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation on October 15, 2015. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this c..
More
ORDER
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#3) of Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. entered October 5, 2015, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (#1) be granted and that Plaintiff's Complaint (#1, Ex.1 ) be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation on October 15, 2015.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Report and Recommendation (#3) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered October 5, 2015, should be ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#3) entered October 5, 2015, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (#1, Ex. 1) is dismissed without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
