U.S. v. EJDOWSKI, 11-cr-178-PB. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. New Hampshire
Number: infdco20120217a21
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER PAUL BARBADORO, District Judge. The defendant has moved through counsel to continue the March 6, 2012 trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to engage in plea negotiations or prepare for trial. The government does not object to a continuance of the trial date. Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will continue the trial from March 6, 2012 to May 1, 2012. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court fin
Summary: ORDER PAUL BARBADORO, District Judge. The defendant has moved through counsel to continue the March 6, 2012 trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to engage in plea negotiations or prepare for trial. The government does not object to a continuance of the trial date. Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will continue the trial from March 6, 2012 to May 1, 2012. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court find..
More
ORDER
PAUL BARBADORO, District Judge.
The defendant has moved through counsel to continue the March 6, 2012 trial in the above case, citing the need for additional time to engage in plea negotiations or prepare for trial. The government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.
Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will continue the trial from March 6, 2012 to May 1, 2012. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(7)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
The February 28, 2012 final pretrial conference is continued to April 20, 2012 at 11:00 a.m.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
