Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hill v. Berryhill, CV 17-68-M-JCL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Montana Number: infdco20180904a81 Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER JEREMIAH C. LYNCH , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Plaintiff's Unopposed Application for Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) filed by and through Plaintiff's attorney, Eric Rasmusson, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant will pay $10,500.00 in attorney fees under the EAJA. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that if, after receiving the Court's EAJA fee Order, the Commissioner: (1) determines upon effectuation of the Court's EAJA f
More

ORDER

Pursuant to Plaintiff's Unopposed Application for Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) filed by and through Plaintiff's attorney, Eric Rasmusson, and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant will pay $10,500.00 in attorney fees under the EAJA.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that if, after receiving the Court's EAJA fee Order, the Commissioner: (1) determines upon effectuation of the Court's EAJA fee Order that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program; and (2) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, the fees will be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney. However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff's attorneys.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer