Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. FERRALES-PORTILLO, 2:15-mj-397-VCF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151013d04 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 08, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO MODIFY COURT ORDERED REQUIREMENTS First Request. CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney, and Nadia Janjua-Ahmed, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United Stated of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Heidi A. Ojeda, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Bryan Ali Ferrales-Portillo, that the Court ordered requirement of attending a gun safe
More

STIPULATION TO MODIFY COURT ORDERED REQUIREMENTS First Request.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney, and Nadia Janjua-Ahmed, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United Stated of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Heidi A. Ojeda, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Bryan Ali Ferrales-Portillo, that the Court ordered requirement of attending a gun safety course be modified to attend an Extended Impulse Control Course.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Following the imposition of sentence in this case, the office of the Federal Public Defender researched several gun safety courses and learned an age requirement of 21 years old is required to attend the courses. Mr. Ferrales-Portillo is 19 years of age, so he would be unable to attend the courses. The FPDs office inquired further as to if the course would accept Mr. Ferrales-Portillo if he had parental consent or parental supervision, and they indicated they would not.

2. Based on this information, the parties request that the Court modify Mr. Ferrales-Portillo's judgement to remove the gun safety course and instead require Mr. Ferrales-Portillo to attend a Court approved Extended Impulse Control Course. The parties believe that the lessons learned through an impulse control course would advance the purposes of sentencing in this case.

This is the first request to modify the Court ordered requirements.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Following the imposition of sentence in this case, the office of the Federal Public Defender researched several gun safety courses and learned an age requirement of 21 years old is required to attend the courses. Mr. Ferrales-Portillo is 19 years of age, so he would be unable to attend the courses. The FPDs office inquired further as to if the course would accept Mr. Ferrales-Portillo if he had parental consent or parental supervision, and they indicated they would not.

2. Based on this information, the parties request that the Court modify Mr. Ferrales-Portillo's judgement to remove the gun safety course and instead require Mr. Ferrales-Portillo to attend a Court approved Extended Impulse Control Course. The parties believe that the lessons learned through an impulse control course would advance the purposes of sentencing in this case.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that the Court ordered requirement of attending a gun safety course be modified to attend an Extended Impulse Control Course.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer