Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, 2:19-cv-01071-JCM-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190926b25
Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . The law firm representing Plaintiff telephoned the undersigned's chambers twice regarding orders issued in this case. Counsel is reminded that the local rules prohibit ex parte communications. Local Rule IA 7-2(b). To the extent counsel has a docketing or clerical question, any communication should be directed to the Clerk's Office and not to chambers. To the extent counsel otherwise seeks relief from or clarification of an order or notice that ha
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . The law firm representing Plaintiff telephoned the undersigned's chambers twice regarding orders issued in this case. Counsel is reminded that the local rules prohibit ex parte communications. Local Rule IA 7-2(b). To the extent counsel has a docketing or clerical question, any communication should be directed to the Clerk's Office and not to chambers. To the extent counsel otherwise seeks relief from or clarification of an order or notice that has..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
The law firm representing Plaintiff telephoned the undersigned's chambers twice regarding orders issued in this case. Counsel is reminded that the local rules prohibit ex parte communications. Local Rule IA 7-2(b). To the extent counsel has a docketing or clerical question, any communication should be directed to the Clerk's Office and not to chambers. To the extent counsel otherwise seeks relief from or clarification of an order or notice that has issued, a proper written request must be filed on the docket. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
