Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. REEVES, 2:12-cv-01916-RCJ-GWF. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20121211g05 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2012
Summary: MOTION AND SPECIAL SHOW CAUSE TO PERMIT APPEARANCE OF GOVERNMENT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. Pursuant to LR IA 10-3, the United States of America respectfully requests that the Court permit Mark C. Milton to practice before this Court in all matters relating to the above-captioned case. Mr. Milton is a trial attorney with the United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, with his office located in Washington, DC, and is an active member in good standing of th
More

MOTION AND SPECIAL SHOW CAUSE TO PERMIT APPEARANCE OF GOVERNMENT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE

ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.

Pursuant to LR IA 10-3, the United States of America respectfully requests that the Court permit Mark C. Milton to practice before this Court in all matters relating to the above-captioned case. Mr. Milton is a trial attorney with the United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, with his office located in Washington, DC, and is an active member in good standing of the Missouri bar.

The grounds for this motion and special show cause to enter an appearance in this case are as follows:

1. The "conduct of litigation in which the United States, an agency, or officer thereof is a party, or is interested, and securing evidence therefor, is reserved to officers of the Department of Justice, under the discretion of the Attorney General." 28 U.S.C. § 516. In addition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 515(a), the Attorney General or any other officer of the Department of Justice is authorized to conduct any kind of legal proceeding, civil or criminal, which United States Attorneys are authorized to conduct, "whether or not he is a resident of the district in which the proceeding is brought." Further, any officer of the Department of Justice may be sent by the Attorney General to any judicial district in the United States "to attend to the interests of the United States in a suit pending in a court of the United States, . . . or to attend to any other interest of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 517.

2. Pursuant to these statutory authorities, the Attorney General has delegated litigation authority to the Assistant Attorney General for the Tax Division, 28 C.F.R., Subpart M, including the assignment of civil suits and matters in federal courts arising under the internal revenue laws. 28 C.F.R. § 0.70(a).

3. While these statutory and legal authorities ordinarily establish the basis for a Tax Division attorney to appear on behalf of the United States in any federal court, on June 6, 2012, this Court gave notice to the First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Nevada that the Court "will no longer grant pro hac recognition to Washington D.C. Justice Attorneys without a special show cause that they will comply with court orders, local ethical rules and the rules of the State Bar of Nevada." (United States of America v. Estate of E. Wayne Hage, et al., 2:07-cv-01154-RCJ-VCF; ECF #336 at 2). In light of that notice, the United States attaches the Declaration of Mark C. Milton, which attests that Mr. Milton will comply with court orders, local ethical rules, and the rules of the State Bar of Nevada.

Accordingly, the United States respectfully requests that an order be issued at the earliest opportunity allowing Mark C. Milton to practice before this Court in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DECLARATION OF MARK C. MILTON

I, Mark C. Milton, submit the following statement in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746:

1. I submit this declaration in support of the Motion and Special Show Cause to Permit Appearance of Government Counsel Pro Hac Vice, I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein. If called upon to testify, I would testify that the facts set forth in this declaration are true and correct.

2. I graduated and received a B.A. in Accountancy, with honors, from the University of Illinois-at Urbana-Champaign in 2007. I received a J.D. degree, cum laude, from St. Louis University School of Law in 2010. I was admitted to the Bar of Missouri in 2010 and I have remained an active member in good standing of that bar at all times since then. In my capacity as a federal government attorney, I have practiced before the United States District Courts in various states, including, but not limited to, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Oklahoma.

3. I have never been the subject of any ethical proceeding, nor has any court or individual ever alleged that I have acted in any manner other than in strict accordance with all applicable legal and ethical rules and standards of conduct

4. I have worked continuously as a practicing attorney for more than two years, all with the Department of Justice, Tax Division.

5. I have been asked by the Department of Justice to serve as lead counsel in the present case, United States of America v. Reeves, et al., 12-cv-01916.

6. I hereby attest and affirm that I will comply with this Court's Orders. I further attest and affirm that I have reviewed and will comply with local ethical rules and the rules of the State Bar of Nevada.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer