Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sierra-Jaimes v. Shultz, 2:18-CV-435. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Texas Number: infdco20190821f45 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER HILDA TAGLE , Senior District Judge . The Court is in receipt of the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 10; Petitioner's Response to the Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 13; and the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), Dkt. No. 14. No objections to the M&R were filed. After independently reviewing the filings, the record, and applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R, Dkt. No. 14. The Court therefore GRANTS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 10, and D
More

ORDER

The Court is in receipt of the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 10; Petitioner's Response to the Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 13; and the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), Dkt. No. 14. No objections to the M&R were filed.

After independently reviewing the filings, the record, and applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R, Dkt. No. 14. The Court therefore GRANTS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 10, and DISMISSES Petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief.

Final judgment will be entered separately.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer