Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bouari v. U.S., 2:18-cv-00219-JCM-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180709b99 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 06, 2018
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) and Local Rule IA 6-1, the United States of America ("United States") moves for an order providing a 30 day extension of time to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1). Based on the date of service of the summons and complaint on the United States, the answer or other response is due by July 3, 2018. With the extension, the deadl
More

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

(First Request)

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) and Local Rule IA 6-1, the United States of America ("United States") moves for an order providing a 30 day extension of time to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1).

Based on the date of service of the summons and complaint on the United States, the answer or other response is due by July 3, 2018. With the extension, the deadline to answer or otherwise respond would be August 2, 2018.

In support of the request, the United States would use the additional time to fully evaluate the allegations in the complaint, determine its relationship to the individually named defendants, and determine whether early resolution is possible. The undersigned counsel has discussed this extension with Plaintiff's counsel and has been informed that he does not oppose the request.

This extension is not sought for purposes of delay or any other improper purposes. It is the first request by the United States for an extension of time to file a response.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer