Trustees of the Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 13 Defined Contribution Pension Trust For Southern Nevada v. Commercial Union Tile & Stone, Inc., 2:15-cv-02129-APG-NJK. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161214c10
Filed: Dec. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree to extend the deadline to file responses to the following pending motions for summary judgment from December 15, 2016 to January 13, 2017: Defendant Jedediah Feller's Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. # 53); Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. #
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree to extend the deadline to file responses to the following pending motions for summary judgment from December 15, 2016 to January 13, 2017: Defendant Jedediah Feller's Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. # 53); Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. # 5..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST)
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
The parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree to extend the deadline to file responses to the following pending motions for summary judgment from December 15, 2016 to January 13, 2017:
Defendant Jedediah Feller's Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. # 53);
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. # 54);
Defendant Vegas Affordable Stone and Tile, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. # 55);
Defendant Stone Consulting, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. # 56);
This is the first request for an extension of time for these deadlines, and the request is not made for the purpose of delay. The parties submit that good cause appears for the extension, as the parties are in the process of discussing a possible resolution to this action and wish to dedicate time and resources to a resolution without incurring additional litigation expense.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
