SMITH v. 21st CENTURY ASSURANCE COMPANY, 2:15-cv-01770-APG-NJK. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160301b40
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER Docket No. 16 NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw. Docket No. 16. Defendant filed a notice of non-opposition. Docket No. 19. The Court finds the motion properly resolved without oral argument, see Local Rule 78-2, and hereby VACATES the hearing set for March 1, 2016. For good cause shown, the motion to withdraw is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk's Office is INSTRUCTED to update the docket with Plaintiff's address.
Summary: ORDER Docket No. 16 NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw. Docket No. 16. Defendant filed a notice of non-opposition. Docket No. 19. The Court finds the motion properly resolved without oral argument, see Local Rule 78-2, and hereby VACATES the hearing set for March 1, 2016. For good cause shown, the motion to withdraw is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk's Office is INSTRUCTED to update the docket with Plaintiff's address. ..
More
ORDER
Docket No. 16
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw. Docket No. 16. Defendant filed a notice of non-opposition. Docket No. 19. The Court finds the motion properly resolved without oral argument, see Local Rule 78-2, and hereby VACATES the hearing set for March 1, 2016. For good cause shown, the motion to withdraw is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk's Office is INSTRUCTED to update the docket with Plaintiff's address. See Docket No. 16 at 2.
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file, no later than March 14, 2016, either a notice that he intends to proceed pro se or a notice of appearance by new counsel. Plaintiff is reminded that pro se parties must comply with all applicable rules and orders, and that the failure to do so may result in significant sanctions, up to and including dismissal of his case. See, e.g., King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
