Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CALKINS v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 2:17-CV-00635-JCM-NJK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170327e13 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR CHASE BANK USA, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (First Request) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A.'s (incorrectly named as "JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (aka CHASE)") ("Chase") response to plaintiff Michael Calkin's complaint currently is due on March 24, 2017. Plaintiff and Chase agree that Chase has up to and including April 7, 2017 to respond to the complaint, to provide time for Chase to investigate plainti
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR CHASE BANK USA, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

(First Request)

Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A.'s (incorrectly named as "JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (aka CHASE)") ("Chase") response to plaintiff Michael Calkin's complaint currently is due on March 24, 2017. Plaintiff and Chase agree that Chase has up to and including April 7, 2017 to respond to the complaint, to provide time for Chase to investigate plaintiff's allegations and the possibility of an early resolution of the claims asserted against Chase.

This is the first request for such an extension, and it is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer