Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mahdi v. American Airlines, Inc., 2:17-cv-02853-RFB-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181109k99 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF No. 50] AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [ECF NO. 51] (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff MAHMUD MAHDI ("Plaintiff") and Defendants AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. and AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC., ("Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to extend the deadline for De
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF No. 50] AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [ECF NO. 51]

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff MAHMUD MAHDI ("Plaintiff") and Defendants AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. and AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC., ("Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendants to File a Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Claim 4) Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3) [ECF No. 50], and its Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (Claims 4, 5 and 6) Pursuant to FRCP 12(c) [ECF No. 51] to up to and including November 14, 2018.

This is the first extension of Defendants' deadline to file a reply in support of its partial motion to dismiss and to file a reply in support of its motion for judgment on the pleadings and is made in good faith by stipulation of the parties. This extension is needed due to Defense counsel's current work load which has included depositions, dispositive motions, and previously scheduled court deadlines which have limited the ability to communicate with Defendants. Accordingly, in order to provide a full and proper substantive reply to Plaintiff's Oppositions, the requested oneweek extension to up to and including November 14, 2018, is necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer