Ramos v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 2:17-cv-02587-GMN-GWF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171208f35
Visitors: 25
Filed: Dec. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff ALEXIS RAMOS (hereinafter, "Plaintiff"), and Defendant WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, (hereinafter "Defendant") by and through their respective attorneys of record, and do hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF #9). Accordingly, Plaintiff sh
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff ALEXIS RAMOS (hereinafter, "Plaintiff"), and Defendant WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, (hereinafter "Defendant") by and through their respective attorneys of record, and do hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF #9). Accordingly, Plaintiff sha..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
COMES NOW, Plaintiff ALEXIS RAMOS (hereinafter, "Plaintiff"), and Defendant WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, (hereinafter "Defendant") by and through their respective attorneys of record, and do hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF #9).
Accordingly, Plaintiff shall have up to and including December 19, 2017, to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF #9). This request is brought in good faith and not for any improper purpose or delay. The reason that the extension is requested is Plaintiff's counsel's need to confer with his client regarding the Motion and facts and argument set forth therein, and due to conflicts with Plaintiff's counsel's schedule.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
