Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Newport Cove Condominium Unit Owners' Association, Inc., 2:17-cv-00474-JCM-NJK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171205c15 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANT DALY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (First Request) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties' counsel of record and subject to the approval of the Court, that discovery in this case be extended with respect to Daly Management Corporation only from December 12, 2017 until January 30, 2017. 1 Thus, this request is timely under Local Rule 26-4 and the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 14).
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANT DALY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

(First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties' counsel of record and subject to the approval of the Court, that discovery in this case be extended with respect to Daly Management Corporation only from December 12, 2017 until January 30, 2017.1 Thus, this request is timely under Local Rule 26-4 and the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 14).

Pursuant to Local Rule 26-4, the parties, through their counsel, state the following:

(a) Discovery completed

The parties have exchanged the following sets of written discovery:

1. Plaintiffs to Defendant Daly Property Management— responses received October 19, 2017

a. Interrogatories b. Requests for Production c. Requests for Admission

2. Plaintiffs to Defendant Newport Cove — responses received October 3, 2017

a. Interrogatories b. Requests for Production c. Requests for Admission

3. Plaintiffs to Defendant Hampton & Hampton

a. Interrogatories b. Requests for Production c. Requests for Admission The parties have completed the following depositions or the depositions will be completed prior to the current discovery cutoff: 1. Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Newport Cove — completed 2. Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Hampton & Hampton — set for December 8, 2017

(b) Discovery that remains to be completed

The following discovery remains to be completed:

1. Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Daly Management Corporation; 2. Plaintiff may propound an additional 10 interrogatories, 10 requests for admission and 10 requests for production of documents to Daly Management in lieu of taking the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Daly Management.

(c) Reasons the remaining discovery was not completed within the time limits set by the discovery plan

Plaintiff noticed the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition for Daly Management Corporation to take place on November 15, 2017 at 2:00 p.m., however, when Plaintiff was advised that the Rule 30(b)(6) witness for Daly was elderly (in his mid-80's) and that he resided in California, Plaintiff agreed to reschedule the deposition to a mutually agreeable time and place in California.

The deposition was subsequently re-noticed for December 4, 2017 at 11:00 a.m., to be conducted by teleconference, with the witness to be in California. However, as mentioned above, the witness is elderly. He also has prostate cancer and is not feeling well. The parties want to allow him time to feel better, and to avoid the holidays; therefore, they have agreed to reschedule his deposition, subject to the Court's approval, for mid-January 2018.

(d) Proposed schedule for completing all remaining discovery.

The parties state this request is made for no improper purpose or delay. The new proposed deadlines would be as follows:

Discovery Cutoff

The discovery cutoff deadline will be extended from December 12, 2017 to January 30, 2018 with respect to Daly Management Corporation only for the purpose of allowing the Plaintiff to conduct the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, or in lieu thereof, to propound 10 interrogatories, 10 requests for production of documents, and 10 requests for admission.

Dispositive Motions

The last day for filing dispositive motions in this case shall be extended from January 11, 2017 to February 12, 2018

Joint Pretrial Order

The deadline to file the Joint Pretrial Order in this case shall be extended from February 9, 2018, to March 12, 2018. In the event dispositive motions are pending before the Court on that date, the date for filing the Joint Pretrial Order shall be suspended until 30 days after the date of the Court's decision on the last dispositive motion.

This is the parties' first request for an extension of the discovery deadline and is not made to delay this matter. Based upon the foregoing, the parties believe there is good cause for the requested extension.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Plaintiffs have a Motion to Stay Discovery pending. See, ECF 49 and ECF 48.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer