HAKKASAN LV, LLC v. ADAMCZYK, 2:14-cv-01717-GMN-NJK. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150611c86
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On February 18, 2015, the Court ordered Defendant Mark Daniel Adamcyzk ("Defendant") to show cause in writing why he should not be sanctioned. Docket No. 34. Defendant then filed an unsigned response. Docket No. 36. The unsigned response was stricken and Defendant was ordered to file a signed response. Docket No. 38. No signed response was ever filed. The Court hereby ADMONISHES Defendant for failing to comply with Court orders. To the extent this
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On February 18, 2015, the Court ordered Defendant Mark Daniel Adamcyzk ("Defendant") to show cause in writing why he should not be sanctioned. Docket No. 34. Defendant then filed an unsigned response. Docket No. 36. The unsigned response was stricken and Defendant was ordered to file a signed response. Docket No. 38. No signed response was ever filed. The Court hereby ADMONISHES Defendant for failing to comply with Court orders. To the extent this ..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
On February 18, 2015, the Court ordered Defendant Mark Daniel Adamcyzk ("Defendant") to show cause in writing why he should not be sanctioned. Docket No. 34. Defendant then filed an unsigned response. Docket No. 36. The unsigned response was stricken and Defendant was ordered to file a signed response. Docket No. 38. No signed response was ever filed. The Court hereby ADMONISHES Defendant for failing to comply with Court orders. To the extent this case continues,1 the Court warns Defendant that future non-compliance with orders may result in the imposition of significant sanctions, up to and including case-dispositive sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. It appears Defendant has ceased participating in this case, as he failed to respond to Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and motion to strike the amended answer and counterclaim. See Docket Nos. 39, 41.
Source: Leagle
