DEFENDANT LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT'S MOTION TO REDACT INFORMATION IN DOCKET NO. 88-1 (Expedited Relief Requested

ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge.

Defendant LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ("LVMPD"), by and through its attorneys of record, Kaempfer Crowell, hereby moves this Court for an Order redacting Exhibit A to LVMPD's Motion for Summary Judgment, located at Docket No. 88-1 pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2. This motion is based on the pleadings and papers on file herein and the following Memorandum of Points and Authorities.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

On February 5, 2015 LVMPD filed Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 88] with Exhibits A-BB attached. Located at Docket No. 88-1, Exhibit A, page 4 of 62, is Plaintiff's Responses to Interrogatories ("Interrogatory Responses"). LVMPD inadvertently did not redact Plaintiff's response which contained his full social security number.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2(a)(1) provides in pertinent part: Unless the court orders otherwise, in an electronic or paper filing with the court that contains and individual's social security number ... a party or nonparty making the filing may include only: the last four digits of the social security number... As stated above, LVMPD inadvertently filed the Interrogatory Responses without redacting the social security number. The error was an oversight and not done with any deliberate intent. All other instances in which Plaintiff's social security number was listed were appropriately redacted.

LVMPD apologizes to the Court and the Plaintiff and seeks to correct this error by way of this instant Motion. As such, LVMPD respectfully requests an Order from this Court directing the Clerk of the Court to redact Plaintiff's social security number in the Interrogatory Responses.

IT IS SO ORDERED.