Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bank of America, National Association v. Cactus Springs Community Association, 2:18-cv-00056. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180403c87 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CACTUS SPRINGS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (hereinafter "BANA") and Defendant CACTUS SPRINGS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION (hereinafter "CACTUS SPRINGS"), (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. WHEREAS BANA is the beneficiary of that certain Deed of Trust executed by Oli
More

STIPULATED JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CACTUS SPRINGS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION

Plaintiff BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (hereinafter "BANA") and Defendant CACTUS SPRINGS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION (hereinafter "CACTUS SPRINGS"), (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. WHEREAS BANA is the beneficiary of that certain Deed of Trust executed by Olivia Barrera ("Borrower") on June 18, 2005, and recorded on July 7, 2005 as document 20050707-0003678 with the Clark County Recorder's Office (the "Deed of Trust"), encumbering real property known as 2605 Rainbow Cactus Court, Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 (the "Property"); AND

2. WHEREAS on December 28, 2015, CACTUS SPRINGS, through its agent, recorded a Notice of Sale, providing notice of a foreclosure sale of its assessment lien for January 20, 2016; AND

3. WHEREAS BANA satisfied the super-priority portion of CACTUS SPRINGS' assessment lien prior to the sale, which effectuated the recordation of "Notice of Satisfaction of Association's Lien Prior to Security Interest" on January 15, 2016, as document 20160115-0002301; AND

4. WHEREAS CACTUS SPRINGS, through tis agent, proceeded with its assessment lien foreclosure sale on January 20, 2016 (the "HOA Sale"), where CACTUS SPRINGS was the highest bidder at the sale, resulting in recordation of a "Certificate of Foreclosure Sale Subject to Redemption" on January 27, 2016 as document 20160127-0003682.

5. WHEREAS CACTUS SPRINGS has not recorded a deed transferring title, and title to the Property remains in the name of Borrower; AND

6. WHEREAS uncertainty and clouds on title exist due to the aforementioned events; AND

7. WHEREAS On January 10, 2018, BANA filed its Complaint for quiet title in this action naming CACTUS SPRINGS and BORROWER as defendants to address the clouds related to the HOA Sale;

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AS FOLLOWS:

1. The HOA Sale did not include a super-priority lien.

2. The HOA Sale did not extinguish the Deed of Trust.

3. CACTUS SPRINGS does not have a current ownership interest in title to the Property, subject to the continuing encumbrance of the CC&Rs.

4. CACTUS SPRINGS will take no action to challenge the continuing validity of the Deed of Trust, nor any foreclosure thereof;

5. CACTUS SPRINGS be dismissed from this action, with prejudice;

6. This Judgment does not affect any rights, claims or defenses of BANA or CACTUS SPRINGS with respect to any other party related to the HOA Sale of the Property.

7. The Parties agree to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT that the HOA Sale did not include a super-priority lien, and thus did not extinguish the Deed of Trust.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Deed of Trust remains a valid and enforceable lien on title;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that CACTUS SPRINGS does not have a current ownership interest in title to the Property, subject to the continuing encumbrance of the CC&Rs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that CACTUS SPRINGS will take no action to challenge the continuing validity of the Deed of Trust, nor any foreclosure thereof;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant CACTUS SPRINGS is hereby dismissed from this case with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this dismissal does not affect any rights, claims or defenses of BANA or CACTUS SPRINGS with respect to any other party related to the foreclosure sale of the Property.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer