Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CHOCOLATE MAGIC LAS VEGAS LLC v. FORD, 2:17-cv-00690-GMN-NJK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170405c22 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DEFENDANT BLAIR FORD TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant Blair Ford ("the parties"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree to the following: 1. Plaintiff served its Complaint on Defendant Blair Ford ("Defendant" or "Ford") on March 11, 20117. 2. Defendant's response is due to be filed on April 3, 2017. 3. Defendant shall have until April 17
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DEFENDANT BLAIR FORD TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff and Defendant Blair Ford ("the parties"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree to the following:

1. Plaintiff served its Complaint on Defendant Blair Ford ("Defendant" or "Ford") on March 11, 20117.

2. Defendant's response is due to be filed on April 3, 2017.

3. Defendant shall have until April 17, 2017 to file and serve his response to Plaintiff's Complaint. This constitutes a two-week extension.

4. The foregoing request for enlargement of time is made in good faith to accommodate the schedule of Defendant's counsel, to conduct further due diligence, and is not made for the purpose of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer