O.R. ex rel. Rogich v. Clark County School District, 2:17-cv-01541-RFB-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180222977
Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD REVERSING DECISION OF STATE REVIEW OFFICER (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff and Defendant Clark County School District ("District"), by and through their attorneys of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that the District may have up to and including February 26, 2018, to respond to PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTR
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD REVERSING DECISION OF STATE REVIEW OFFICER (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff and Defendant Clark County School District ("District"), by and through their attorneys of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that the District may have up to and including February 26, 2018, to respond to PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRA..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD REVERSING DECISION OF STATE REVIEW OFFICER
(First Request)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
COMES NOW, Plaintiff and Defendant Clark County School District ("District"), by and through their attorneys of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that the District may have up to and including February 26, 2018, to respond to PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD REVERSING DECISION OF STATE REVIEW OFFICER (hereinafter referred to as "the Motion") in this matter. The Motion was served on January 22, 2018; therefore, the current response date is February 12, 2018. This is the first request for an extension to the response due date.
This request is being entered for good cause, in good faith, and not for reason of delay. Although District's counsel has been actively working on a response to the Motion, she has been called out of state to address the severe medical needs of an elderly parent.
THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request the response due date be extended fourteen (14) days up to and including February 26, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
