OMRAN v. BLEEZARDE, 1:15-cv-190-DBH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. New Hampshire
Number: infdco20160512a90
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 11, 2016
Latest Update: May 11, 2016
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On March 10, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on motions to dismiss and the plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on May 5, 2016. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determ
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On March 10, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on motions to dismiss and the plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on May 5, 2016. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determi..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
On March 10, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on motions to dismiss and the plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on May 5, 2016. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The motions to dismiss of the defendants Frichittavong and Noronha are GRANTED. The plaintiff's motion to amend complaint is DENIED IN PART as to amending the claim asserted against the defendants Frichittavong and Noronha, and is otherwise GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
