Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SANKALP RECREATION PVT. LTD. v. PRAYOSHA RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC, 13-5529 (JLL). (2014)

Court: District Court, D. New Jersey Number: infdco20140402b31 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOSE L. LINARES, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court by way of Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and stay this matter pending arbitration [Docket Entry No. 10]. This Court had referred Defendant's motion to the Honorable Joseph A. Dickson, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 (b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Dickson filed a Report and Recommendation in connection with said application on March 17, 2014. In particular, Magistrate Judge Dickson reco
More

ORDER

JOSE L. LINARES, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court by way of Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and stay this matter pending arbitration [Docket Entry No. 10]. This Court had referred Defendant's motion to the Honorable Joseph A. Dickson, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Dickson filed a Report and Recommendation in connection with said application on March 17, 2014. In particular, Magistrate Judge Dickson recommended that Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and stay this matter be granted. To date, the Court has received no objections with respect to Magistrate Judge Dickson's March 17, 2014 Report and Recommendation, and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this 1th day of April, 2014,

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Dickson, filed on March 17, 2014 [Docket Entry No. 35], is hereby ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant's motion to compel arbitration [Docket Entry No. 10] is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that, given Defendant's request to stay this action, the Court will exercise its discretion and stay these proceedings until such time that the arbitration is complete. See generally 9 U.S.C. § 3; Lloyd v. Hovensa, 369 F.3d 263, 269 (3d Cir. 2004). For purposes of judicial economy, the Clerk's Office is hereby directed to administratively terminate this action pending the outcome of the arbitration. Plaintiff shall notify the Court, upon completion of the arbitration, if this matter should be restored to the active docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer