U.S. v. JIMENEZ, 4:14CR3013. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20140428c61
Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge. Mr. Monzon, the defendant's retained counsel, called me subsequent to my most recent order (filing no. 30) denying the issuance of subpoenas sought pursuant to an ex parte motion. In his telephone call, counsel sought advice on how to obtain this process without informing the government. I refused to hold an ex parte phone conference with counsel on that subject. However, I now advise Mr. Monzon that he may wish to consult Federal
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge. Mr. Monzon, the defendant's retained counsel, called me subsequent to my most recent order (filing no. 30) denying the issuance of subpoenas sought pursuant to an ex parte motion. In his telephone call, counsel sought advice on how to obtain this process without informing the government. I refused to hold an ex parte phone conference with counsel on that subject. However, I now advise Mr. Monzon that he may wish to consult Federal R..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge.
Mr. Monzon, the defendant's retained counsel, called me subsequent to my most recent order (filing no. 30) denying the issuance of subpoenas sought pursuant to an ex parte motion. In his telephone call, counsel sought advice on how to obtain this process without informing the government. I refused to hold an ex parte phone conference with counsel on that subject. However, I now advise Mr. Monzon that he may wish to consult Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(a), (c)(1) and (d) regarding (1) the issuance of subpoenas endorsed in blank; (2) for the production of documents, and (3) for service of the subpoenas by a nonparty over the age of 18 years.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
