Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

AKSENOVA v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, 2:17-cv-01050-APG-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170710c59 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12). Pursuant to LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion. No opposition has been filed and the time to file an opposition has passed. Here, it would seem that Defendants have conse
More

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12).

Pursuant to LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion. No opposition has been filed and the time to file an opposition has passed. Here, it would seem that Defendants have consented to the granting of the instant motion.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED. The First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (ECF No. 12-1) must be filed on or before July 14, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer