OOIDA RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC. v. BOURDEAUX, 3:15-CV-0081-RCJ (VPC). (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170523d10
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 22, 2017
Latest Update: May 22, 2017
Summary: ORDER VALERIE P. COOKE[[/Author]] , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is the motion of plaintiff OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc. ("OOIDA") for sanctions pursuant to the court's inherent power and 28 U.S.C. 1927 (ECF No. 131). Defendant/counter-claimant Robert M. Burts ("Burts") opposed (ECF No. 135) and OOIDA replied (ECF No. 140). On May 3 and 4, 2017, this court held an evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 174 & 175). The court has carefully reviewed the extensive record in this proceeding a
Summary: ORDER VALERIE P. COOKE[[/Author]] , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is the motion of plaintiff OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc. ("OOIDA") for sanctions pursuant to the court's inherent power and 28 U.S.C. 1927 (ECF No. 131). Defendant/counter-claimant Robert M. Burts ("Burts") opposed (ECF No. 135) and OOIDA replied (ECF No. 140). On May 3 and 4, 2017, this court held an evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 174 & 175). The court has carefully reviewed the extensive record in this proceeding an..
More
ORDER
VALERIE P. COOKE[[/Author]], Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is the motion of plaintiff OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc. ("OOIDA") for sanctions pursuant to the court's inherent power and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (ECF No. 131). Defendant/counter-claimant Robert M. Burts ("Burts") opposed (ECF No. 135) and OOIDA replied (ECF No. 140). On May 3 and 4, 2017, this court held an evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 174 & 175).
The court has carefully reviewed the extensive record in this proceeding and has considered the testimony and evidence presented at the evidentiary hearing. Having done so, and for good cause appearing, OOIDA's motion for sanctions (ECF No. 131) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
