Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BOSEKE v. THE LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, 2:15-cv-00978-JCM-GWF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20161117h42 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LVMPD'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOCK. # 30 (FIRST REQUEST) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Plaintiff, above named, by and through her undersigned counsel, KIRK T. KENNEDY, ESQ., and the Defendant, LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, by and through its undersigned counsel, BRIANNA SMITH, ESQ., and Defendant SOLOMON COLEMAN, by and through his undersigned co
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LVMPD'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOCK. # 30 (FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Plaintiff, above named, by and through her undersigned counsel, KIRK T.

KENNEDY, ESQ., and the Defendant, LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, by and through its undersigned counsel, BRIANNA SMITH, ESQ., and Defendant SOLOMON COLEMAN, by and through his undersigned counsel, JEFFREY GRONICH, ESQ., that the Defendant LVMPD's motion for summary judgment, Dock.#30, filed on October 25, 2016, has a pending due date for a response by November 18, 2016, however, the parties agree to extend the time for the Plaintiff's response to December 2, 2016.

This is the first request for an extension of time by the Plaintiff to file her response to the motion for summary judgment. This stipulation is entered into as Plaintiff's counsel needs additional time to prepare the response.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer