OLVERA v. SHAFTER, 2:14-cv-01298-GMN-NJK. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20141124b86
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER NANCY J KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Docket No. 79. The proposed discovery plan misstates Local Rule 26-4, in that it provides that requests to extend deadlines in the scheduling order need only be filed 20 days before the discovery cut-off. See Docket No. 79 at 4. Local Rule 26-4 requires that any request to extend deadlines set forth in the scheduling order must be submitted at least 21 days be
Summary: ORDER NANCY J KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Docket No. 79. The proposed discovery plan misstates Local Rule 26-4, in that it provides that requests to extend deadlines in the scheduling order need only be filed 20 days before the discovery cut-off. See Docket No. 79 at 4. Local Rule 26-4 requires that any request to extend deadlines set forth in the scheduling order must be submitted at least 21 days bef..
More
ORDER
NANCY J KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Docket No. 79. The proposed discovery plan misstates Local Rule 26-4, in that it provides that requests to extend deadlines in the scheduling order need only be filed 20 days before the discovery cut-off. See Docket No. 79 at 4. Local Rule 26-4 requires that any request to extend deadlines set forth in the scheduling order must be submitted at least 21 days before the subject deadline. For example, any request to extend the deadline for initial expert disclosures must be filed at least 21 days before the expiration of that deadline. Such a request filed only 21 days before the discovery cut-off would be untimely.
In an effort to ensure future compliance and complete understanding of the Local Rules, the Court hereby ORDERS attorneys D. Brian Boggess, Evan Wishengrad, John Mugan, and Michael Lum to file a certification with the Court no later than December 1, 2014, indicating that they have read and comprehend Local Rules 26-4 and 26-1. Counsel are advised that similar violations in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
