JOHNSON v. COX, 3:14-cv-00213-RCJ-WGC. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150505910
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiff has asked the Court to overrule the Magistrate Judge's April 1, 2015 rulings denying his motions for appointment of counsel and his motions to compel. ( See Orders, ECF Nos. 40, 41). The Magistrate Judge adequately explained why appointment of counsel was not appropriate and correctly determined that Plaintiff did not meet and confer before filing his motions to compel and that the motions were without merit, in any case. Finding no error,
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiff has asked the Court to overrule the Magistrate Judge's April 1, 2015 rulings denying his motions for appointment of counsel and his motions to compel. ( See Orders, ECF Nos. 40, 41). The Magistrate Judge adequately explained why appointment of counsel was not appropriate and correctly determined that Plaintiff did not meet and confer before filing his motions to compel and that the motions were without merit, in any case. Finding no error, ..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Plaintiff has asked the Court to overrule the Magistrate Judge's April 1, 2015 rulings denying his motions for appointment of counsel and his motions to compel. (See Orders, ECF Nos. 40, 41). The Magistrate Judge adequately explained why appointment of counsel was not appropriate and correctly determined that Plaintiff did not meet and confer before filing his motions to compel and that the motions were without merit, in any case. Finding no error, the Court denies the motions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Reconsider (ECF Nos. 43, 44) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
