Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marrufo v. Faber and Brand LLC, 19-392 SMV/GBW. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20191106e26 Visitors: 22
Filed: Nov. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT GREGORY B. WORMUTH , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Protective Order. Doc. 22 . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6), Plaintiff sought to depose Defendant's representatives on October 22, 2019. See doc. 22-2 . Defendant moves the Court to prevent Plaintiff from asking questions on matters subject to attorney-client and work-product privileges, among other objections. See generally doc. 22 . In
More

ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Protective Order. Doc. 22. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6), Plaintiff sought to depose Defendant's representatives on October 22, 2019. See doc. 22-2. Defendant moves the Court to prevent Plaintiff from asking questions on matters subject to attorney-client and work-product privileges, among other objections. See generally doc. 22. In a telephonic status conference held on November 4, 2019, the Court confirmed that the depositions to which the motion was directed took place as scheduled. Doc. 24 at 2. As Defendant had the opportunity to lodge objections during the deposition, the Court finds the motion moot.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Protective Order (doc. 22) is DENIED as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer