Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Alexander, 2:99-cr-363-APG-LRL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170502c26 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 01, 2017
Latest Update: May 01, 2017
Summary: Stipulation to Extend the Deadline for government's Response to Defendant's 2255 motion ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Steven W. Myhre, Acting United States Attorney, and Elizabeth O. White, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America; and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Nisha Brooks-Whittington, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, counsel for Frank Darwin Alexander, to submit the follo
More

Stipulation to Extend the Deadline for government's Response to Defendant's § 2255 motion

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Steven W. Myhre, Acting United States Attorney, and Elizabeth O. White, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America; and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Nisha Brooks-Whittington, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, counsel for Frank Darwin Alexander, to submit the following Stipulation to extend the due date for Government's response to Mr. Alexander's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct criminal convictions and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 until May 31, 2017.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons

1. Mr. Alexander filed an abridged motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on June 22, 2016; and filed a supplemental motion on December 20, 2016. ECF No. 15, 17. On March 31, 2017, this Court ordered the government to file a response to the Motion and Supplemental Motion by May 1. ECF No. 19.

2. In the four weeks since the Court issued its order directing the government to file its response, the assistant United States attorney responsible for preparing that response has prepared and filed 14 other court-ordered responses to motions to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and approximately 50 other responses to motions and notices ancillary to pending § 2255 motions. In addition, she has filed court-ordered responses to two petitions for rehearing en banc in the Ninth Circuit, and has prepared for and appeared at a contested 2255 motions hearing and a sentencing hearing. She has a court-ordered response to a petition for a writ of mandamus due in the Ninth Circuit next Thursday, and an opening brief in an affirmative government appeal due next Friday.

Consequently, government counsel requests additional time to review, research, and prepare the government's response to Mr. Alexander's § 2255 motion. For that reason, the parties agree to a 30-day continuance, from May 1, 2017 to May 31, 2017 for the government to file its response.

Based on the Stipulation of counsel and good cause appearing,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Response deadline is May 31, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer