Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BROWN v. CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, 2:15-cv-01670-APG-NJK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170209c43 Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 87) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for spoliation sanctions. Docket No. 87. On January 5, 2017, the Court referred this case to the pro bono pilot program and that process is still ongoing. See Docket No. 83. It is possible that a newly retained attorney may wish to amend the motion for sanctions or pursue another legal approach generally. As a result, the Court will hold the pending motion for spoliation sanctions i
More

ORDER

(Docket No. 87)

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for spoliation sanctions. Docket No. 87. On January 5, 2017, the Court referred this case to the pro bono pilot program and that process is still ongoing. See Docket No. 83. It is possible that a newly retained attorney may wish to amend the motion for sanctions or pursue another legal approach generally. As a result, the Court will hold the pending motion for spoliation sanctions in ABEYANCE. In the event that the motion remains pending (i.e., it is not withdrawn or amended by a new appearing counsel), the response to the motion shall be filed by April 12, 2017. In the event pro bono counsel appears and does not withdraw or amend the motion, counsel shall file a joint stipulation as to a briefing schedule within 21 days of the appearance by pro bono counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer