Crawford v. Forest River, Inc., 6:18-CV-229-RWS-KNM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20181116e33
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 10, the "Report"), which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding Defendant Ally Bank Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Docket No. 8) has been presented for consideration. The Report, filed on September 11, 2018, recommends that Defendant's Motion be
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 10, the "Report"), which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding Defendant Ally Bank Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Docket No. 8) has been presented for consideration. The Report, filed on September 11, 2018, recommends that Defendant's Motion be g..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 10, the "Report"), which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding Defendant Ally Bank Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Docket No. 8) has been presented for consideration. The Report, filed on September 11, 2018, recommends that Defendant's Motion be granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. No written objections have been filed. The Court therefore ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court. In light of the foregoing, it is hereby
ORDERED that the complaint against Defendant Ally Bank Corp. is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Source: Leagle
