Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Hill, 2:16-cr-00114-JAD-GWF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170124c76 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DEADLINE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF GOVERNMENT WITNESSES [Dkt. #47] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney, and Alexandra Michael, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rebecca Levy, AFPD, counsel for Defendant RAMSEY HILL, that the deadline for Government's Response to Defendant's Motion In Limine
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DEADLINE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF GOVERNMENT WITNESSES [Dkt. #47]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney, and Alexandra Michael, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rebecca Levy, AFPD, counsel for Defendant RAMSEY HILL, that the deadline for Government's Response to Defendant's Motion In Limine To Preclude Testimony Of Government Witnesses (Dkt. #47), currently due on January 23, 2017, be continued for two (2) weeks.

This stipulation is entered for the following reasons:

1. Counsel for the Government needs additional time to research and prepare a response to the Defendant's Motion.

2. The parties agree to the continuance.

3. The Defendant is incarcerated, but he does not object to a brief continuance of the Government's response deadline.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(1)(D) and 3161(h)(7) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(3)(A), when considering the facts under Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(7)(B), 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), but should not impact the trial setting which is currently set for February 7, 2017.

6. This is the first request for a continuance filed herein.

ORDER TO CONTINUE THE RESPONSE DEADLINE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF GOVERNMENT WITNESSES [Dkt. #47]

This stipulation is entered for the following reasons:

1. Counsel for the Government needs additional time to research and prepare a response to the Defendant's Motion.

2. The parties agree to the continuance.

3. The Defendant is incarcerated, but he does not object to a brief continuance of the Government's response deadline.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(1)(D) and 3161(h)(7) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(3)(A), when considering the facts under Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(7)(B), 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), but should not impact the trial setting which is currently set for February 7, 2017.

6. This is the first request for a continuance filed herein.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the Government's deadline to respond to the Defendant's motion in limine to preclude testimony of government witnesses scheduled for January 23, 2017, be vacated and continued to February 3, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer