PHILLIPS v. STATE, 2:16-cv-00412-GMN-CWH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160310c38
Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is Plaintiff David Lee Phillips's Motion to Limit Pre-Trial Publicity (ECF No. 14), filed on March 3, 2016. Plaintiff requests that the Court limit all pre-trial publicity pending the resolution of this matter. Plaintiff does not provide any points and authorities in support of his motion in contravention of Local Rule 7-2, which requires all motions to be supported by points and authorities and provides that the "fai
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is Plaintiff David Lee Phillips's Motion to Limit Pre-Trial Publicity (ECF No. 14), filed on March 3, 2016. Plaintiff requests that the Court limit all pre-trial publicity pending the resolution of this matter. Plaintiff does not provide any points and authorities in support of his motion in contravention of Local Rule 7-2, which requires all motions to be supported by points and authorities and provides that the "fail..
More
ORDER
C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff David Lee Phillips's Motion to Limit Pre-Trial Publicity (ECF No. 14), filed on March 3, 2016. Plaintiff requests that the Court limit all pre-trial publicity pending the resolution of this matter. Plaintiff does not provide any points and authorities in support of his motion in contravention of Local Rule 7-2, which requires all motions to be supported by points and authorities and provides that the "failure of a moving party to file points and authorities in support of the motion shall constitute a consent to the denial of the motion." The Court therefore will deny Plaintiff's motion without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle