GROVE v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., 2:13-cv-00854-GMN-CWH. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20130816b89
Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 13, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2013
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Quash (#31), filed August 9, 2013. Plaintiff is not familiar with the Court rules and filing procedures. Her motion to quash is, in fact, a response to Defendant's motion (#16). To the extent she does seek to have the pending motion quashed, she has failed to provide any points or authorities in support of the request. See Local Rule 7-2(d) ("The failure of a moving party to file points and
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Quash (#31), filed August 9, 2013. Plaintiff is not familiar with the Court rules and filing procedures. Her motion to quash is, in fact, a response to Defendant's motion (#16). To the extent she does seek to have the pending motion quashed, she has failed to provide any points or authorities in support of the request. See Local Rule 7-2(d) ("The failure of a moving party to file points and a..
More
ORDER
C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Quash (#31), filed August 9, 2013. Plaintiff is not familiar with the Court rules and filing procedures. Her motion to quash is, in fact, a response to Defendant's motion (#16). To the extent she does seek to have the pending motion quashed, she has failed to provide any points or authorities in support of the request. See Local Rule 7-2(d) ("The failure of a moving party to file points and authorities in support of the motion shall constitute a consent to the denial of the motion."). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Quash (#31) is denied.
Source: Leagle
