IN RE OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION, 2:11-cv-1016. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20170914785
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2017
Summary: ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr. , Chief District Judge . This capital case is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Notice of Mootness of Plaintiffs' Objections (ECF Nos. 1156, 1160) to Magistrate Judge's Order (ECF No. 1154) and Magistrate Judge's Modifications to Order Regarding Testing of Phillips's Execution Materials (ECF No. 1159). (ECF No. 1191.) Plaintiffs filed Objections (ECF Nos. 1156 and 1160) to the Magistrate Judge's Orders regarding testing of materials from Ron
Summary: ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr. , Chief District Judge . This capital case is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Notice of Mootness of Plaintiffs' Objections (ECF Nos. 1156, 1160) to Magistrate Judge's Order (ECF No. 1154) and Magistrate Judge's Modifications to Order Regarding Testing of Phillips's Execution Materials (ECF No. 1159). (ECF No. 1191.) Plaintiffs filed Objections (ECF Nos. 1156 and 1160) to the Magistrate Judge's Orders regarding testing of materials from Rona..
More
ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS
EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr., Chief District Judge.
This capital case is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Notice of Mootness of Plaintiffs' Objections (ECF Nos. 1156, 1160) to Magistrate Judge's Order (ECF No. 1154) and Magistrate Judge's Modifications to Order Regarding Testing of Phillips's Execution Materials (ECF No. 1159). (ECF No. 1191.)
Plaintiffs filed Objections (ECF Nos. 1156 and 1160) to the Magistrate Judge's Orders regarding testing of materials from Ronald Phillips' execution (ECF Nos. 1154 and 1159). Plaintiffs now notify the Court because the parties have shipped their materials to their preferred laboratories (ECF Nos. 1166 and 1183) and because the testing is likely to be destructive (ECF No. 1174), Plaintiffs' objections concerning those materials (ECF Nos. 1156 and 1160) are now moot.
The Court accordingly OVERRULES Plaintiffs' Objections (ECF Nos. 1156 and 1160).
Source: Leagle
