Filed: Apr. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO FILE REPLIES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [SECOND REQUEST] RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . COME NOW, Defendant, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA [hereinafter "Safeco], by and through its counsel of record, the law firm of KOELLER, NEBEKER, CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP, and Plaintiff, EDWARD STOLZ, by and through his attorney of record, Matthew M. Pruitt, Esq., of the law firm of ALVERSON, TAYLOR, MORTENSEN & SANDERS, and hereby
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO FILE REPLIES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [SECOND REQUEST] RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . COME NOW, Defendant, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA [hereinafter "Safeco], by and through its counsel of record, the law firm of KOELLER, NEBEKER, CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP, and Plaintiff, EDWARD STOLZ, by and through his attorney of record, Matthew M. Pruitt, Esq., of the law firm of ALVERSON, TAYLOR, MORTENSEN & SANDERS, and hereby s..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PARTIES TO FILE REPLIES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [SECOND REQUEST]
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
COME NOW, Defendant, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA [hereinafter "Safeco], by and through its counsel of record, the law firm of KOELLER, NEBEKER, CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP, and Plaintiff, EDWARD STOLZ, by and through his attorney of record, Matthew M. Pruitt, Esq., of the law firm of ALVERSON, TAYLOR, MORTENSEN & SANDERS, and hereby stipulate to extend the time for each to file their Replies to one another's respective Motions for Summary Judgment filed in the above-entitled matter.
Each party filed their own Motion for Summary Judgment on January 8, 2016. Oppositions to the respective Motions were filed by the parties on February 16, 2016. (See, Court Documents Nos. 42, 43, 46 and 47, on-file herein). On March 1, 2016, this Court granted the parties' Stipulation to extend time to file Replies to the respective Motions to allow for potential informal settlement negotiations and mediation and/or a settlement conference. (Se, Court Document No. 49, on-file, herein).
The parties have diligently worked towards scheduling mediation in this matter. However, unexpected scheduling concerns have made scheduling mediation more difficult than anticipated. The parties are currently attempting to schedule mediation during the last three (3) weeks of May 2016. As such, the parties have agreed to seek an additional extension of time to file their Replies, as indicated herein.
The parties' Replies are currently due by or before May 3, 2016. As such, the parties hereby request an Order from this Court memorializing that Replies to each party's Motion for Summary Judgment are now due by or before Friday, July 1, 2016.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for each party to file its Reply in support of the presently pending Motions for Summary Judgment (Court Documents Nos. 42, 43, 46 and 47, on-file herein) is extended until Friday, July 1, 2016. The parties will also submit a joint status report to this Court regarding any pending motions by July 8, 2016.
