REINER v. CITY OF EUREKA, 326 S.W.3d 853 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco110324001251
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 14, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2010
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Robert R. Reiner, as trustee of the Reiner Family Trust, appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Eureka, Michael Weigand and Ronald Jones (collectively, "the City"). We find the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the City. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Robert R. Reiner, as trustee of the Reiner Family Trust, appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Eureka, Michael Weigand and Ronald Jones (collectively, "the City"). We find the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the City. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b)..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robert R. Reiner, as trustee of the Reiner Family Trust, appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Eureka, Michael Weigand and Ronald Jones (collectively, "the City"). We find the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the City. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
