Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., 2:18-cv-00953-RFB-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180809c04 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2018
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT APPLE INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (Second Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and District of Nevada Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant Apple Inc. ("Defendant") respectfully moves the Court for an order extending the time for Defendant to answer the Complaint to November 12, 2018. The Complaint was filed on May 24, 2018. The Court granted
More

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT APPLE INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

(Second Request)

Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and District of Nevada Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant Apple Inc. ("Defendant") respectfully moves the Court for an order extending the time for Defendant to answer the Complaint to November 12, 2018.

The Complaint was filed on May 24, 2018. The Court granted a stipulated extension of time to answer the Complaint by August 14, 2018. (Doc. 8). Good cause exists for this second requested extension of time. Defendant intends to file a motion to transfer this case to another district and the additional time will allow the parties to resolve that issue before Defendant has to answer the Complaint. Accordingly, Defendant has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed to not oppose, an extension of 90 days to file and serve its answer or other response to the Complaint. The new deadline would be November 12, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer