Correa v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 2:16-cv-01852-JAD-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20191205c45
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2019
Summary: Order Dismissing Action, Vacating Trial, and Closing Case JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . This wrongful-death case arises out of the shooting death of Abel Correa by Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) officers Glenn Taylor and Eli Prunchak. In anticipation of the trial of this case that is scheduled to begin on December 17, 2019, defendants moved in limine to preclude plaintiffs from presenting any evidence of their damages because the plaintiffs failed to disclose or co
Summary: Order Dismissing Action, Vacating Trial, and Closing Case JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . This wrongful-death case arises out of the shooting death of Abel Correa by Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) officers Glenn Taylor and Eli Prunchak. In anticipation of the trial of this case that is scheduled to begin on December 17, 2019, defendants moved in limine to preclude plaintiffs from presenting any evidence of their damages because the plaintiffs failed to disclose or com..
More
Order Dismissing Action, Vacating Trial, and Closing Case
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
This wrongful-death case arises out of the shooting death of Abel Correa by Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) officers Glenn Taylor and Eli Prunchak. In anticipation of the trial of this case that is scheduled to begin on December 17, 2019, defendants moved in limine to preclude plaintiffs from presenting any evidence of their damages because the plaintiffs failed to disclose or compute their damages as Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)((1)(A) requires and the plaintiffs identified no medical-care providers or other experts who can testify about their claimed emotional-distress damages.1 The plaintiffs did not oppose that motion and the Court granted it on November 20, 2019.2
The result of that order is that the plaintiffs are precluded from introducing any evidence of damages at the trial scheduled for December 17, 2019. Because damages are an essential element of the plaintiffs' claims, the inability to prove this element is fatal to their claims, rendering trial moot. So, the Court ordered the plaintiffs to show cause in writing by December 2, 2019, why this case should not be dismissed and the trial vacated for inability to prove a required element of their claims at trial. That court-ordered deadline passed without response or a request to extend it. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to VACATE the 12/17/19 Jury Trial and all related dates and deadlines and CLOSE THIS CASE.
FootNotes
1. ECF No. 74.
2. ECF No. 76.
Source: Leagle