Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. RODRIGUEZ, 2:14-CR00367-001. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150505880 Visitors: 20
Filed: May 01, 2015
Latest Update: May 01, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING RICHARD F. BOUWLARE, II , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between PAMELA MARTIN, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for Plaintiff, and BENJAMIN DURHAM, counsel for Defendant, that the sentencing currently scheduled for May 5, 2015, be vacated and continued for approximately 30 days from the current sentencing date. This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons: 1. Defense counsel needs additional time to p
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between PAMELA MARTIN, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for Plaintiff, and BENJAMIN DURHAM, counsel for Defendant, that the sentencing currently scheduled for May 5, 2015, be vacated and continued for approximately 30 days from the current sentencing date.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Defense counsel needs additional time to prepare and complete certain actions related to sentencing mitigation in order to effectively represent Mr. Rodriguez before this Honorable Court at the time of sentencing. The Defendant concurs in this request.

2. All parties agree to the continuance.

3. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. This is the first request to continue sentencing filed herein.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court finds:

1. Defense counsel needs additional time to prepare and complete certain actions related to sentencing mitigation in order to effectively represent Mr. Rodriguez before this Honorable Court at the time of sentencing. The Defendant concurs in this request.

2. All parties agree to the continuance.

3. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. This is the second request to continue sentencing filed herein.

For all of the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the sentencing.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for sentencing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sentencing currently scheduled for May 5, 2015, be continued to Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at the hour of 10:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer