Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BARRAZA v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 2:16-cv-00484-JAD-VCF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160503f65 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2016
Summary: Order Denying Motion for Entry of Default [ECF No. 16] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiffs Miguel Barraza, Dinora Barraza, and Nana I AM sue U.S. Bank, Clear Recon Corp., PNC Bank, and the Golden Team Keller Williams Realty for a host of claims including fraud, RICO, and conspiracy. 1 The plaintiffs move the Clerk of Court to enter default against Clear Recon Corp., arguing that this defendant was served on March 7, 2016, but has not answered the complaint. 2 Rule 55(a) of
More

Order Denying Motion for Entry of Default

[ECF No. 16]

Plaintiffs Miguel Barraza, Dinora Barraza, and Nana I AM sue U.S. Bank, Clear Recon Corp., PNC Bank, and the Golden Team Keller Williams Realty for a host of claims including fraud, RICO, and conspiracy.1 The plaintiffs move the Clerk of Court to enter default against Clear Recon Corp., arguing that this defendant was served on March 7, 2016, but has not answered the complaint.2

Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a default to be entered "when a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend."3 Although the plaintiffs are correct that Clear Recon Corp. has not answered, it has otherwise defended itself in this action: it has joined in the banks' motion to dismiss.4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' request for entry of default [ECF No. 16] is DENIED.

FootNotes


1. ECF No. 1.
2. ECF No. 16.
3. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a).
4. See ECF No. 17.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer