Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Boruchowitz v. Demeo, 2:16-cv-02971-JAD-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180116c31 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ECF No. 47 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff DAVID BORUCHOWITZ, by and through his attorney Brent D. Huntley of SHUMWAY VAN, Defendants ANTHONY DEMEO, ANTONIO MEDINA, and RICHARD MARSHALL, by and through their attorney Nicholas Crosby of MARQUIS & AURBACH, and Defendant NYE COUNTY, by and through its attorney Rebecca Bruch of ERICKSON THORPE & SWAINSTON, LTD., that Case No.
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ECF No. 47

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff DAVID BORUCHOWITZ, by and through his attorney Brent D. Huntley of SHUMWAY VAN, Defendants ANTHONY DEMEO, ANTONIO MEDINA, and RICHARD MARSHALL, by and through their attorney Nicholas Crosby of MARQUIS & AURBACH, and Defendant NYE COUNTY, by and through its attorney Rebecca Bruch of ERICKSON THORPE & SWAINSTON, LTD., that Case No. 2:16-cv-02971-JAD-NJK is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41.

ORDER

Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 47] andgood cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer