Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Henderson v. Nevada ex rel. Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services, 18-cv-01728-JAD-PAL. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190410f05 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, CARLA HENDERSON ("HENDERSON"), by and through her attorney, JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ., of the law firm HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP, and Defendant, STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. SOUTHERN NEVADA ADULT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, ("DEFENDANT"), by and through its attorney, SUSSANNE M. SLIWA, ESQ., of NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, and hereby stipulates and agrees as follows: 1. During the Early
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY

COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, CARLA HENDERSON ("HENDERSON"), by and through her attorney, JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ., of the law firm HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP, and Defendant, STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. SOUTHERN NEVADA ADULT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, ("DEFENDANT"), by and through its attorney, SUSSANNE M. SLIWA, ESQ., of NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, and hereby stipulates and agrees as follows:

1. During the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, the parties discussed a partial resolution. The parties do not have control over the timing or outcome of the discussed resolution and await for the result. Should the partial resolution come to fruition, the parties expect to reach a settlement.

2. That discovery in the above referenced case be stayed until April 3, 2019. The reason for the stay is that the Parties hope that a settlement may soon be reached.

3. The parties' stipulation for a stay is not intended to have any effect on the Court's orderly review and disposition of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 20), Defendant's Answer to Amended Complaint (ECF No. 22), or any other motions that may be filed by either party during the stay.

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY in the above-entitled matter and for good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS SO ORDERED that the discovery in the above referenced case stay until April 3, 2019, unless otherwise deemed sooner by Plaintiff and Defense counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED The parties' stipulation for a stay is not intended to have any effect on the Court's orderly review and disposition of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 20), Defendant's Answer to Amended Complaint (ECF No. 22), or any other motions that may be filed by either party during the stay.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer