Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KLEIN v. SCOTT, 3:11-cv-00648-MMD-VPC. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140707d16 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. It is stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff, Paul Scott Klein, pro se, and Defendants, Dr. William M. Donnelly, Brian Egerton, Dr. Karen Gedney, Dr. Marsha Johns, Dr. David A. Mar, Donald Poag, Dr. John Scott and Debra Williams ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel, Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Paul T. Young, Deputy Attorney General, that Plaintiff's Civil
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.

It is stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff, Paul Scott Klein, pro se, and Defendants, Dr. William M. Donnelly, Brian Egerton, Dr. Karen Gedney, Dr. Marsha Johns, Dr. David A. Mar, Donald Poag, Dr. John Scott and Debra Williams ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel, Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Paul T. Young, Deputy Attorney General, that Plaintiff's Civil Rights Complaint (Docket No. 9) be dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs.

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Having considered the preceding STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, as agreed to by the parties hereinabove, good cause having been shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed with prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer