Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SAUER v. NEVEN, 2:12-cv-01724-GMN-GWF. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20130412e04 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 08, 2013
Summary: MOTION TO EXTEND STAY AND ENLARGE TIME (FIRST REQUEST) GEORGE W. FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge. COMES NOW Defendant, Eric Burson, by and through counsel, Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General, and Raelene K. Palmer, Deputy Attorney General, and hereby respectfully submits the instant Motion to extend the stay and enlarge the time to prepare the 90-Day Stay Report in the above-referenced matter. This Motion is brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), LR 6-2, the attached Points and Authorities
More

MOTION TO EXTEND STAY AND ENLARGE TIME (FIRST REQUEST)

GEORGE W. FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.

COMES NOW Defendant, Eric Burson, by and through counsel, Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General, and Raelene K. Palmer, Deputy Attorney General, and hereby respectfully submits the instant Motion to extend the stay and enlarge the time to prepare the 90-Day Stay Report in the above-referenced matter. This Motion is brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), LR 6-2, the attached Points and Authorities, and the papers and pleadings on file with the Court herein.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff commenced an action in this Court by filing both an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and a Civil Rights Complaint on October 2, 2012. (See Court Docket(s) "CD(s)" #1 through #1-1). On January 8, 2013, the Court screened the Complaint and as part of the Screening Order, the Court stayed the litigation for 90 days, with instructions for the Office of the Attorney General to file a Report on the status of settlement negotiations by March 12, 2013. (CD #7). On February 8, 2013, the Court issued an Order Setting Inmate Early Mediation Conference ("EMC"), which is presently scheduled for May 10, 2013. (CD #10). Defendant now hereby submits the instant Motion to extend the stay and enlarge the time to prepare the 90-Day Stay Report.

II. LEGAL ARGUMENT

Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b)(1)(A) provides, in pertinent part:

(b) Extending Time. (1) In General. When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time: (A) with or without motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires[.]

Rule 6(b)(1) allows for a party to move for an enlargement of time, the determination of which lies with the presiding court. "The Court has inherent power and discretion to control its docket, and the proceedings within the cases on its docket." Ford v. County of Missoula, Mont., 2010 WL 2674036, 1 (D.Mont., 2010) (citing Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b) (advisory committee note, 1946) ("Rule 6(b) is a rule of general application giving wide discretion to the court to enlarge these time limits or revive them after they have expired . . .").

Because the EMC will not be held until May 10, 2013, Defendant is requesting a six-week extension of the stay and to file the 90-Day Stay Report, to and including May 20, 2013, for the purpose of avoiding unnecessary motion practice before the mediation and in order to report the results of the mediated negotiation efforts which will take place in May. This request is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

III. CONCLUSION

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), because good cause has been shown, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court enlarge the stay and the time by which his counsel, the Office of the Attorney General, must file the 90-Day Stay Report to and including May 20, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer