Elawyers Elawyers
Massachusetts| Change

Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., 2:18-cv-00953-RFB-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180605b35 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jun. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT APPLE INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and District of Nevada Local Rule IA 6-1, Plaintiff Voip-Pal.com, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Defendant") state the following: The Complaint was filed on May 24, 2018. Good cause exists for the requested extension of time. Defendant
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT APPLE INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

(First Request)

Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and District of Nevada Local Rule IA 6-1, Plaintiff Voip-Pal.com, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Defendant") state the following:

The Complaint was filed on May 24, 2018. Good cause exists for the requested extension of time. Defendant needs additional time to evaluate all of the claims alleged in the Complaint. Accordingly, Defendant has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed to grant, an extension of time up to and including August 14, 2018, to file and serve its answer or other response to the Complaint.

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED:

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer