Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Slack v. United Airlines, Inc., 2: 18-cv-00899-GMN-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180822d26 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Plaintiff Peter Slack may have additional time within which to submit Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. 1. Under the Federal Rules of Civil
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Plaintiff Peter Slack may have additional time within which to submit Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint.

1. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff's Reply would be due August 21, 2018. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(3)(A).

2. On August 17, 2018, Marta D. Kurshumova, counsel for Plaintiff, conferred with Hilary B. Muckleroy, counsel for Defendant, regarding the timing of Plaintiff's Reply. Counsel for Defendant consented to Plaintiff's request to enlarge the time for filing the reply by eight (8) days, which would make the new deadline Wednesday, August 29, 2018.

3. Good cause exists for this extension as Plaintiff's counsel will be out of town from August 18, 2018 through August 24, 2018 for a family commitment.

4. The extension will not result in undue delay in the administration of this cause.

5. No other enlargement of time has been previously requested in this case.

This document is being electronically filed through the Court's ECF System. In this regard, counsel for Plaintiff hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) Defendant's counsel has concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production if so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer