Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROMERO v. ASTRUE, 11-895 CG. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20120607b41 Visitors: 21
Filed: May 14, 2012
Latest Update: May 14, 2012
Summary: ORDER TO EXPUNGE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AND EXTENDING DEADLINES CARMEN E. GARZA, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Parties' Stipulation to Expunge the Administrative Record, the Court having read the motion and being fully advised in the premises finds that the Certified Administrative Transcript filed on April 13, 2012 (Doc. No. 10), pertains to an individual with the same first and last name who is not related to this case, and should be destroyed. IT IS THER
More

ORDER TO EXPUNGE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AND EXTENDING DEADLINES

CARMEN E. GARZA, Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Parties' Stipulation to Expunge the Administrative Record, the Court having read the motion and being fully advised in the premises finds that the Certified Administrative Transcript filed on April 13, 2012 (Doc. No. 10), pertains to an individual with the same first and last name who is not related to this case, and should be destroyed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall remove and destroy all electronic and paper copies of the Certified Administrative Transcript filed on April 13, 2012 (Doc. 10), from its files and the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's attorney, the Assistant United States Attorney, and the Assistant Regional Counsel shall destroy all paper and electronic copies of the transcript in their possession.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefing schedule entered on April 16, 2012 (Doc. 13) is amended to account for the lost time and to accommodate the unavailability of Plaintiff's counsel, as follows: Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse or Remand to Administrative Agency with Supporting Memorandum is due on or before July 30, 2012; Defendant shall file a Response on or before September 28, 2012; and Plaintiff may file a Reply on or before October 15, 2012.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer