Bank of America, N.A. v. Premier One Holdings, Inc., 2:15-cv-00860-JCM-NJK. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150605c31
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT AUGUSTA BELFORD AND ELLINGWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsels that Defendant AUGUSTA BELFORD AND ELLINGWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION shall have through and including June 19, 2015 , within which to file and serve a response to Plaintiff's Complaint. This is the first extension from the original due
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT AUGUSTA BELFORD AND ELLINGWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsels that Defendant AUGUSTA BELFORD AND ELLINGWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION shall have through and including June 19, 2015 , within which to file and serve a response to Plaintiff's Complaint. This is the first extension from the original due d..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT AUGUSTA BELFORD AND ELLINGWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsels that Defendant AUGUSTA BELFORD AND ELLINGWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION shall have through and including June 19, 2015, within which to file and serve a response to Plaintiff's Complaint. This is the first extension from the original due date of May 28, 2015, and the parties' second request. See, Docket Entry No. 12, and subsequent order denying the first request, Docket Entry No. 13.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), the parties state the reason for the continuance is that Belford HOA requires more time to evaluate and to respond to Bank of America's Complaint. The parties have entered into the agreement in good faith and not for purposes of delay. This is the parties' way of accommodating one another given the overall increase in litigation in this area of law.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
